Bed joint reinforcement has become a standard detail in masonry construction - most designers and contractors already specify and install it.
The real question today is no longer “should we use bed joint reinforcement?” but rather:
“What happens to the wall 5, 10 or 20 years from now - and does the choice of material change that outcome?”
This is where the difference between steel and non-corrosive alternatives becomes more than a preference.
It becomes a long-term performance issue.
In this article, we focus on the specific, real-world reasons why engineers, contractors and system providers are moving from steel bed joint reinforcement to solidian Briksy, and what that change actually delivers in practice.
Steel bed joint reinforcement is familiar, widely used and easy to specify. However, masonry walls are not judged on the first day of installation.
They are judged on:
And inside the mortar joint -the place you cannot inspect - steel corrodes.
Mortar gradually loses its initial high alkalinity. Moisture migrates through joints. Salts accumulate in exposed zones.
Result:
This is often the root cause of:
Steel may be standard — but it is not stable.
solidian Briksy is made from glass or carbon fibres, both fully resistant to corrosion inside the mortar.
This means:
The reinforcement performs the same on year 20 as on day one.
In exposed areas such as:
…the difference between steel and non-corrosive reinforcement becomes dramatic.

Steel expands and contracts with temperature changes more than masonry units. This mismatch creates:
With non-corrosive reinforcement (glass or carbon fibres):
This compatibility is one of the main engineering reasons behind the move to Briksy in modern systems.
Openings are the weak points of every wall. This is where:
solidian Briksy offers:
For designers and contractors, this means:

Steel bed joint reinforcement requires a minimum mortar cover of around 15 mm on each side, as specified in Eurocode guidance, primarily for durability and fire resistance. This means that the steel is positioned deeper within the cross-section, and the outermost zone of the wall is unreinforced.
Non-metallic fibre reinforcement such as solidian Briksy is not governed by steel corrosion in the same way. In principle, fibres can be effective closer to the surface, and distributed fibres can start contributing to tensile load transfer as soon as microcracks form. From a mechanical perspective, this suggests a potential for earlier engagement of the reinforcement under out-of-plane bending and improved crack control in the outer layers of the wall.
While dedicated design provisions for fibre-reinforced masonry are still being developed in European practice, the mechanical behaviour outlined above is in line with current research and applications of non-metallic reinforcement in mortars and concretes. In practice, specific requirements for cover, embedment depth and fire resistance of Briksy reinforcement are defined by the applicable standards, approvals and test results for each project, rather than by this explanatory note.
Bed joint reinforcement is not new. But the way we build today - and the performance we expect from masonry - has changed.
Steel was a solution for another era. Moisture-rich, exposed, fast-paced modern construction demands a reinforcement material that will not deteriorate.
That is what solidian Briksy delivers.
A bed joint reinforcement that:
All while fitting into the same detailing approach designers and contractors already use.
For installation guidelines, detailing examples and recommended spacing, see:
→ solidian Briksy - User Guide (PDF)
→ solidian Briksy - Product Page
build solid.